Regulation of the UK Financial System
-
Historically, a lack of regulation of financial activities has led to risky loans, poor investments, and banking losses
-
In response, the Bank of England has increased its supervision and regulation of financial institutions to provide financial stability and a degree of protection for depositors and borrowers
-
The following regulatory bodies were set up to oversee the financial system in the UK:
-
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA)
-
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC)
-
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
-
Role of Regulatory Bodies in the UK
|
Regulatory body |
Explanation |
|---|---|
|
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) |
|
|
The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) |
|
|
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) |
|
Reasons why Banks Fail
-
The Financial Crisis of 2008 highlighted fragility of the financial system
-
Governments had to step in to save individual banks from failure (e.g. RBS)
-
Reasons that Banks Fail
|
Reasons |
Explanation |
|---|---|
|
High-risk loans |
|
|
Regulation violation |
|
|
Speculation & market bubbles |
|
|
Asymmetric information |
|
Liquidity & Capital Ratio
-
The financial crisis of 2007, highlighted the need to regulate excessive risk-taking by financial institutions and banks
-
Banks are now required to meet capital and liquidity ratios to evaluate their capacity to manage unexpected shocks
Liquidity ratio
-
The liquidity ratio is the ratio of a bank’s cash and other liquid assets to its deposits
-
This ratio measures a bank’s ability to meet its short-term obligations and cash needs. It assesses a a bank’s liquidity by comparing liquid assets to its short-term liabilities
Capital ratio
-
The capital ratio is the amount of capital on a bank’s balance sheet as a proportion of its loans
-
It measures the funds it holds from profits and issuing shares
-
The aim is to identify the level of risk associated with lending
Moral Hazard
-
Moral Hazard has increased in the financial sector since 2008 as Governments have stepped in to save individual banks from failure (e.g. RBS)
-
Banks seem to be considered ‘too big to fail’ and governments bear the consequences of their risky behaviour
-
The financial sector returned to questionable practices within two years: The China Hustle documents how investment funds and stockbrokers played up obscure Chinese companies who presented fake financial data
-
This stimulated investor demand, temporarily pushing up prices. Many investors lost a lot of money
-
Systemic Risk in Financial Markets
-
Systematic failure is when a minor local problem in one country’s financial sector has international consequences
-
A single bank can trigger the breakdown of an entire market or even the entire financial system
-
-
Banks may collapse following periods of low interest rates, accessible credit, and excessive speculation
-
This may cause a sudden and steep decline in asset prices (e.g., shares or housing) leading to a default on loans
-
This could rapidly escalate into a much more severe international situation
-
-
In 2007, French bank BNP Paribas informed depositors that they could not withdraw from two of their funds. The value of the assets in those fund could not be determined
-
Banks then stopped transactions with each other as they could not trust that borrowing could be returned. This caused a freeze in liquidity and led to a sudden increase in interest rates
-
As a result of this and other causes of the credit crunch, banks collapsed. This triggered a global financial crisis and recession
-
In some cases, the government and central bank intervened. This helped avert an overall systemic failure, but significant economic harm occurred
-
Responses