The relationship between delegation and accountability
-
Delegation occurs when responsibility for specific tasks is given to subordinates by managers
-
It is particularly important in businesses with a flat organisational structure, where managers have a wide span of control
-
It usually involves transferring authority from manager to subordinate
-
E.g. The HR director of a large company delegates authority for recruitment and training to the Recruitment and Training Manager
-
-
Tasks that are delegated need to be well-defined, and instruction may be required
-
-
Accountability means that an individual has the responsibility to report on and explain their actions fully and honestly
-
Accountability requires several important components to be present
-
Clear expectations of anticipated outcomes are agreed upon
-
The accountable employee has appropriate skills, training and experience
-
Effective communication throughout the delegated task takes place, including ongoing feedback
-
There are clear consequences related to performance
-
-
-
Effective delegation involves giving both authority to subordinates to make decisions and demanding accountability for those decisions
Implications of delegation
|
Implications for managers |
Implications for workers |
|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Examiner Tips and Tricks
In the exam, you could be asked to analyse delegation as a way to motivate workers. While some may see having more authority as a non-financial incentive that motivates them, some workers may be anxious about taking on extra responsibility or lack the appropriate skills.
The difference between authority and responsibility
-
Authority is the right or power to give orders, make decisions and control resources
-
It allows a person (usually a manager or supervisor) to direct others and take action to achieve business goals
-
-
Responsibility is the duty to complete a task or meet a target
-
It means being accountable for doing a job properly and on time, even if the task was delegated to someone else
-
Authority and responsibility: key considerations
-
Authority and responsibility must go hand in hand
-
A person who is responsible for a task should also be given enough authority to carry it out effectively
-
-
Authority should match responsibility:
-
For example, if a team leader is responsible for meeting a deadline, they need the authority to assign tasks, set priorities, and manage team members
-
If someone is responsible but has no authority, they might fail due to lack of power or resources
-
-
Imbalance can cause problems
-
Too much authority but not enough responsibility can lead to misuse of power or unfair delegation
-
Too much responsibility but not enough authority can lead to frustration and failure to complete tasks
-
-
Authority, responsibility and delegation
-
A manager may delegate authority and responsibility, but ultimate responsibility stays with the manager
-
For example, if a supervisor delegates stock checks to a worker, the worker is responsible for doing it, but the supervisor is still accountable overall
-
Conflicts between control and trust when delegating
-
Control is the manager’s need to monitor, direct, and ensure tasks are done correctly and on time
-
This control helps maintain standards and avoid mistakes and helps ensure the business is on track to achieve its goals
-
However, if a manager retains too much control, workers can feel micromanaged, reducing their morale and limiting their initiative
-
-
Trust is the belief that employees will complete tasks responsibly without needing constant supervision
-
When managers trust their subordinates, it builds confidence, improves relationships and increases motivation
-
However, too much trust without enough control may lead to errors, missed deadlines or a lack of accountability
-
Where conflict happens
|
Situation |
Conflict |
|---|---|
|
A manager gives a task but constantly checks in |
|
|
A task is fully handed over with no follow-up |
|
|
An employee makes a mistake and the manager takes back control |
|
Case Study
Improving delegation at Fernside Hotels Group
Fernside Hotels is a small chain of boutique hotels across the UK.
The manager of one hotel, Sarah, needed to organise a last-minute promotional event to increase local bookings during a quiet season.
She delegated the task of planning the event to Callum, the hotel’s Events and Guest Experience Coordinator
Conflict
-
Although Sarah delegated the task, she kept dropping in to check on Callum’s progress, making frequent suggestions and requesting small changes.
-
Callum began to feel undermined and frustrated
-
He had previously successfully managed smaller events and now felt a lack of trust
-
He became less confident about making decisions, which slowed down the planning process
-
-
Sarah was worried the event might not reflect the brand standards if she wasn’t closely involved
Conflict resolution
-
After an honest conversation, Sarah and Callum recognised the tension was hurting performance and morale
-
Sarah reflected on her approach and decided to manage delegation more effectively, using clear steps
|
Steps |
Explanation |
|---|---|
|
Clear expectations and deadlines |
|
|
Authority with support |
|
|
Structured check-ins |
|
Review of outcomes
-
After the event, which was a success and boosted weekend bookings by 30%, they sat down to reflect
-
Sarah praised Callum’s creativity and organisation, and they identified one or two areas for improvement next time