Back to 课程

Business_A-level_Cie

0% Complete
0/0 Steps
  1. business-and-its-environment

    enterprise
    6 主题
  2. business-structure
    6 主题
  3. size-of-business
    3 主题
  4. business-objectives
    3 主题
  5. stakeholders-in-a-business
    2 主题
  6. external-influences-on-business
    12 主题
  7. business-strategy
    10 主题
  8. human-resource-management
    human-resource-management-hrm
    8 主题
  9. motivation
    4 主题
  10. management
    2 主题
  11. organisational-structure
    5 主题
  12. business-communication
    5 主题
  13. leadership
    2 主题
  14. human-resource-strategy
    3 主题
  15. marketing
    the-nature-of-marketing
    7 主题
  16. market-research
    3 主题
  17. the-marketing-mix
    6 主题
  18. marketing-analysis
    5 主题
  19. marketing-strategy
    3 主题
  20. operations-management
    the-nature-of-operations
    3 主题
  21. inventory-management
    2 主题
  22. capacity-utilisation-and-outsourcing
    1 主题
  23. location-and-scale
    2 主题
  24. quality-management
    1 主题
  25. operations-strategy
    4 主题
  26. finance-and-accounting
    business-finance
    2 主题
  27. sources-of-finance
    3 主题
  28. forecasting-and-managing-cash-flows
    1 主题
  29. costs
    4 主题
  30. budgets
    1 主题
  31. financial-statements
    4 主题
  32. analysing-published-accounts
    6 主题
  33. investment-appraisal
    2 主题
课 Progress
0% Complete

An introduction to political influences

  • Political influences refer to the ways in which government actions, decisions, and policies can affect how a business operates

    • These can come from local, national or international governments

Flowchart showing "Areas of political influence" with five branches: Taxation policy, Trade policies, Government spending, Political stability, Laws and regulations.
Political influence on business comes from laws, regulations, tax policy, trade policy, government spending and stability
  • Laws and regulations

    • Businesses must follow rules related to health and safety, employment, consumer protection, and the environment

    • Breaking laws can lead to fines, damage to reputation or even being shut down

  • Taxation policy

    • Governments decide how much tax businesses must pay

    • Higher taxes can reduce profits

    • Lower taxes may encourage investment or expansion

  • Trade policies

    • Includes tariffs, quotas, and free trade agreements

    • These influence how easily businesses can buy and sell goods internationally

  • Government spending

    • When governments invest in infrastructure, such as roads, hospitals and schools, certain businesses benefit

    • During economic downturns, governments may also support industries through subsidies or grants

  • Political stability

    • Businesses prefer to operate in stable countries where laws and policies are predictable

    • In countries with unrest or frequent policy changes, there is more risk

Case Study

Nestlé India and changing environmental regulations

  • In 2019, the Indian government introduced strict environmental regulations to reduce plastic waste

  • This included phasing out single-use plastics, such as plastic straws and wrappers, used in food and beverage packaging

Responses

  • Nestlé India responded to the changing political environment by

    • Re-designing packaging for products, including Maggi noodles and chocolate bars

    • Investing in research to develop recyclable and biodegradable materials

    • Working with suppliers to source new eco-friendly packaging materials

    • Launching campaigns to inform customers of its new sustainability efforts

Impacts

  • Costs increased in the short term due to changes in materials and production

  • However, Nestlé improved its brand image, especially among environmentally aware consumers

  • The company avoided legal penalties and reputational damage by acting early

Privatisation

  • Privatisation occurs when government-owned firms are sold to the private sector

    • Examples of industries that are often privatised include transport, energy, telecommunications and healthcare services

  • Many government-owned firms have been partially privatised

    • The government retains a share in them so they can influence decision-making and receive a share of the profits

    • e.g. Shares in Singapore Airlines are 55% government-owned and 45% privately owned 

Advantages of privatisation

1. Raises government revenue

  • Governments earn money from selling state-owned businesses

  • Funds can be used to reduce debt or invest in public services

2. Improves efficiency

  • Private firms aim to cut waste, boost productivity and earn profits

  • Often more innovative and customer-focused than public organisations

3. Reduces government spending

  • Running businesses is costly for governments

  • Selling them reduces long-term financial pressure

4. Encourages investment

  • Private ownership attracts both domestic and foreign investors

  • Can lead to more jobs and economic growth

    • E.g., Nigeria’s sale of NITEL helped expand mobile coverage

5. Increases competition and choice

  • Opens markets to new firms, giving consumers more options

  • Can lead to better services and lower prices

    • E.g. Privatising parts of Australia’s rail and electricity sectors led to lower prices for customers

Disadvantages of privatisation

Disadvantage

Explanation

Example

Focus on profit over service

  • Private firms may prioritise profit rather than providing high-quality or universal services

  • US private healthcare companies have been criticised for putting profit before patient care

Loss of public control

  • Once sold, the government has limited control over how the service is run

  • In Argentina, water services were privatised in the 1990s, leading to concerns over foreign control and rising prices

Job losses

  • To cut costs, private firms may reduce staff or cut wages and benefits

  • In Greece, privatisation during the financial crisis led to significant redundancies in the transport and energy sectors

Unequal access

  • Services may become too expensive or be reduced in less profitable rural areas

  • In South Africa, rural communities complained of reduced access after parts of the electricity sector were privatised

Risk of private monopoly

  • If no competition exists, one firm may dominate and exploit consumers

  • In Russia, the early 1990s saw the creation of powerful monopolies after rapid privatisation, especially in oil and gas

Short-term thinking

  • Private firms may avoid long-term investment to boost short-term profits

  • In India, some critics argued that privatised rail contractors cut maintenance budgets to save money, risking safety

Nationalisation

  • Nationalisation is when a government takes ownership and control of a business or industry from the private sector

    • This means the service or company is now owned by the state and run on behalf of the public

  • Nationalisation usually happens in sectors that are considered essential or where private ownership has failed to meet the needs of society

Advantages of nationalisation

  • Nationalisation allows the government to directly manage industries that are vital to the economy or national security, such as transport, healthcare, or energy

    • This means it can set policies in the public interest, such as keeping prices affordable, ensuring services reach rural areas or responding quickly in times of crisis

  • Unlike private firms, state-owned businesses don’t need to maximise profit for shareholders

    • This means services can be designed to benefit citizens, workers and consumers more fairly

    • Prices may be lower, access more equal and working conditions more secure

  • When a business is nationalised, it may gain financial stability and access to long-term government investment

    • This can be especially helpful if the business was struggling under private ownership

    • Government backing also allows the company to focus on long-term goals, such as infrastructure development or environmental sustainability, without worrying about short-term profit pressures or investor demands

Disadvantages of nationalisation

  • Running a nationalised business can be very expensive

    • The government must fund day-to-day operations, invest in maintenance and improvements, and cover losses if the business isn’t profitable

    • This can place a strain on public finances, especially during economic downturns

  • Without the pressure to make a profit or compete with rivals, nationalised businesses may become less efficient

    • They might have more bureaucracy, slower customer service, or fewer incentives to innovate

    • Customers and workers may experience delays, outdated technology, or inconsistent quality

  • Nationalised businesses can be affected by political pressure, where decisions are made for short-term popularity rather than long-term success

    • Politicians may interfere in areas like pricing, recruitment or expansion, even if it goes against what’s best for the business

    • This can make planning and management difficult, especially as different governments often have diverse priorities

Case Study

Nationalisation of YPF – Argentina’s Oil Giant

Scenario

In 2012, the Argentine government made headlines when it nationalised 51% of YPF, the country’s largest oil company, which was majority-owned at the time by the Spanish firm Repsol. This dramatic shift brought a key energy asset back under state control

Industrial skyline with YPF sign, oil rig, smokestacks emitting smoke, and the Argentine flag waving, symbolising oil industry in Argentina.

Reasons for nationalisation

  • Strategic industry control: Oil and gas are essential to Argentina’s economy and energy independence. The government argued that letting a foreign company control such a vital sector was risky

  • Falling investment: Repsol was accused of failing to reinvest enough in Argentina’s oil infrastructure. As a result, domestic production was declining, forcing the country to import more energy, worsening its trade balance

  • Public interest and economic stability: The government believed nationalisation would allow Argentina to boost production, lower fuel import bills, and make energy more affordable and accessible, especially in rural and underserved regions

Outcome

  • Short-term benefits: Nationalisation helped stabilise energy supplies. The state could now steer investment toward long-term infrastructure goals and reduce reliance on imports

  • Increased government control: The move gave Argentina more control over pricing and supply, enabling subsidised fuel prices for domestic consumers

  • Legal and financial fallout: However, the nationalisation sparked international lawsuits. Argentina had to eventually compensate Repsol nearly $5 billion, which strained public finances

  • Efficiency concerns: Critics noted that YPF’s productivity improved slowly, and the firm faced issues with bureaucracy, political interference, and a lack of innovation—typical drawbacks associated with state-run enterprises