Exam code:7131
Making decisions using data
-
Scientific decision making involves using data to make rational, logic-based decisions
-
This method lowers risk, but it isn’t perfect — good data costs money, and numbers never tell the whole story
-
What the scientific approach involves
-
Set the objective
-
E.g. increase sales of gym accessories to under‑25s by 5 % by November 2025
-
-
Collect data
-
A range of internal and external sources can provide useful insights
-
Internal data, such as:
-
Sales and loyalty card records
-
Production logs
-
Finance systems
-
Website analytics
-
-
External data, such as:
-
Government statistics
-
Industry reports
-
Social media trends
-
Customer reviews
-
-
-
Analyse data, and select an option
-
Use statistics, A/B tests or forecasts to determine the best options, then make a choice based on the strongest evidence
-
-
Implement the decision
-
Put in place the resources required, such as finance, staff, equipment and premises
-
-
Review and learn
-
Compare outcomes with the original goal; make necessary changes to keep improving
-
Stages in the decision-making process

Scientific decision-making at Tesco
|
Stage |
Explanation |
Example |
|---|---|---|
|
Setting objectives |
|
|
|
Gathering information |
|
|
|
Choosing an option |
|
|
|
Implementing the decision |
|
|
|
Reviewing the decision |
|
|
Benefits of scientific decision-making
-
Reduces risk
-
Decisions rest on evidence, not guesswork
-
Firms using reliable data are more likely to report better outcomes
-
-
Justifies investment
-
Clear numbers help win the support of a board of directors, investors or lenders, such as banks
-
-
Supports continuous improvement
-
Constant measurement helps a business to identify what works and what may need to be changed
-
Limitations of scientific decision-making
-
Cost and time
-
Gathering and analysing data is expensive
-
It may be unaffordable for smaller businesses or those with a poor cash situation
-
-
Data quality issues
-
Bad or biased data can lead to wrong or inappropriate decisions being made
-
-
Overreliance
-
Managers can ignore gut feel or ethics
-
They may miss out on opportunities that have a good chance of success because the data does not recognise their potential
-
-
Incomplete picture
-
Not all risks are measurable, and relying on data means that businesses can miss surprises such as rapid market change
-
Intuition and decision-making
-
Managers sometimes rely on gut feel, experience and pattern‑spotting rather than detailed data analysis to choose a course of action
-
Experienced managers build quick mental shortcuts from years of experience, so their gut instantly signals, “This feels right”
-
Situations where intuitive decision-making may work best
|
Situation |
Reason |
Example |
|---|---|---|
|
Little time for data |
|
|
|
No clear precedent |
|
|
|
Decision rests on human taste |
|
|
Benefits of intuitive decision-making
-
Speed
-
Rapid action can allow a business to seize opportunities before rivals can react
-
-
Creativity
-
It frees managers to pursue bold ideas that data might reject
-
-
Uses deep expertise
-
Experienced managers base decisions on past successes, failures and patterns
-
Limitations of intuitive decision-making
-
Bias and overconfidence
-
Personal likes or recent events can cloud judgement
-
-
Hard to justify
-
Convincing investors or lenders without data to back up ideas can be difficult
-
-
Riskier on big bets
-
A wrong hunch can be very costly, so managers risk their personal reputations in pursuing them
-
Responses