Exam code:9GE0
Causes of Migration
-
Most migrants move for work; known as economic migrants
-
Others move to re-join family members, as part of the diaspora growth
-
Post-colonial migrant flows to the UK when former colonies became part of the Commonwealth
-
After the second World War, many countries had labour shortages and needed to rebuild their economies
-
The 1948 British Nationality Act, gave people from UK colonies, the right to live and work in Britain
-
Job vacancies in the UK offered an opportunity to people in Caribbean countries, who were also struggling economically post-war
-
Many of those who came, became manual workers, drivers, cleaners, and nurses in the newly-established NHS and known as the Windrush Generation
-
-
International migrants are not always the poorest, as money is needed to make a journey (even human trafficking has costs to the migrant)
-
There are other causes of migration, including displacement of refugees due to conflict and poverty in countries of origin
Types of Migrants
|
|
Definition |
Internal |
External |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Voluntary |
The individual or household has a free choice about whether to move or not |
Rural to urban for jobs |
West Indians to the UK |
|
Urban to rural retirement |
British doctors to the USA |
||
|
Forced |
Occurs when the individual or household has little or no choice but to move |
British inner city slum clearance |
African slaves to America – Atlantic slave trade |
|
Amerindians into rainforest reserves |
War – 8.1 million refugees were recorded leaving Ukraine in 2022 |
||
|
Impelled or Political |
This may be due to environmental or human factors |
Natural disasters – Mt Pinatubo, Philippines |
Muslims and Hindu in India |
-
Forced migration still occurs today – Syrian refugee crisis, Ukrainians forced to flee from Russian invasion etc.
-
Counter-migration, in which governments detain migrants who enter or attempt to enter their countries illegally and return the migrants to their home countries
-
Impelled migration as a result of natural disasters has unexpected consequences
-
Many Montserratians fled to the United States when Plymouth was destroyed in 1995 and were given ‘temporary protected’ immigration status
-
The U.S. government told Montserratian refugees to leave in 2005 – not because the volcanic crisis was over or because the housing crisis caused by the eruption was solved
-
Rather, the U.S. government expected the volcanic crisis to last at least 10 more years; so, the Montserratians no longer qualified as ‘temporary’ refugees
-
Economic Theory & Migration
-
There are five economic theories for migration:
Five Economic Theories of Migration
|
Theory |
Explanation |
Example |
|---|---|---|
|
Neoclassical economic theory |
Wage differences pull or push people from low-wage regions to higher-wage regions |
Internal migration in developing regions such as rural India to cities such as Mumbai |
|
Dual labour market theory |
Developed countries ‘pull’ migrant workers to fill low-skilled jobs, as local population unwilling to do this work |
Fruit and vegetable harvesting in the UK, attracts EU workers |
|
World systems theory |
Trade between countries is favourable to one above the other, encouraging migration along these trade routes |
Former colonies remain dependent on colonial superpower – UK and India |
|
Relative deprivation theory |
People feel they have less in comparison to someone else (usually wealth), and therefore, feel deprived. Successful migrants act as examples to the source community encouraging migration |
North/South migration in the UK, where people in the north of England feel deprived in relation to the south and migrate southwards |
|
New economics of labour migration (NELM) |
The theory views migration as an economic strategy of a household and suggests that the family’s economic situation would change as the family member sends remittances back. The family’s act together to spread the cost and all benefits eventually |
Male construction workers from India migrating to Dubai and sending remittances home to families |
Movement of Labour
-
In many nation states, the movement of labour is unrestricted and is based on the notion that humans are an economic resource for businesses to exploit
-
It is considered an efficient way of allocating resources e.g. regional movements in the UK
-
Flows of migrants are focused on core economic development regions, at varying levels from local, national and international
-
In order to achieve maximum economic output, businesses argue that people should be allowed to move freely to available jobs, therefore, migration is considered an effective method of achieving this
-
This is the basis of free movement of labour and allows workers to seek work in another country, without requiring any visa
-
This principle also applies to some global regions such as the European Union (EU) but not at a global level – China restricts all movement of its workers, both internally and internationally
-
However, free movement creates winners and losers:
Advantages and Disadvantages of Free Movement of Labour
|
Advantages |
Disadvantages |
|---|---|
|
Business profits increase due to a fall in wages – businesses have a choice of who to employ |
Increased competition for jobs and many people have multiple jobs in order to survive |
|
Highly skilled workers are in demand and command higher wages |
Businesses lose profits when having to pay higher wages to skilled employees |
|
Trickle down wealth from core regions to the peripheries – branch offices and factories |
Changing economic activity and loss of income or unemployment |
|
People have a choice of where to work and live |
Loss of talent – ‘brain drain’ |
Barriers to freedom of movement – China’s hukou records
-
As of 2020, 60.6% of the total Chinese population lived in urban areas, a dramatic increase from 17.92% in 1978
-
When the Communist Party in China came to power in 1949, under Mao Zedong (Chairman Mao)
-
One of its goals was to create economic stability between the country’s large rural farming population (periphery) and its growing urban areas (core)
-
One problem China saw, was the potentially large influx of rural workers to the cities looking for higher paying jobs
-
To avoid protests, strikes and slum development such as those in Latin America and Indian cities, the Chinese government implemented the Huji system in 1958
-
This was to serve three main functions:
-
Control of internal migration
-
Management of social protection
-
Preservation of social stability
-
-
The plan was to implement a classification system to keep record of all Chinese people as either a rural or urban citizen. The government then tied all social benefits (healthcare, education, social security, working rights, etc.) to a person’s local government
-
The system is called “huji” but it’s commonly known by the name of the records “Hukou.” The Hukou System was implemented in 1958 and is still in place today
-
The Hukou System effectively limits the amount of rural-urban migration. People from rural China would be far less likely to move to urban areas if it means giving up their healthcare, education and social security
-
People from urban areas were given preferential treatment
-
They got better social benefits; since their local governments had more resources
-
They had access to higher paying jobs and rural workers were limited in the urban marketplace
-
Because the people from urban areas were more likely to have an education, they were also considered more likely to protest
-
The preferential treatment was considered a way of calming the risk of any major uprising against the Communist Party
Impact on rural regions
-
Whilst urban citizens enjoy a supply of labour opportunities and comfortable benefits for their families
-
Rural people struggle as farming in rural China is very difficult
-
The terrain is mountainous and the land lacks sufficient nutrients for farming
-
Access to clean water is scarce and there is often extreme draught
-
There is little economic infrastructure and a lack of access to modern farming equipment
-
As China’s economic power grew, the cities grew, and jobs become more available, the trade-offs for rural farmers to move to the city became more attractive
-
In recent years, the rate of Chinese rural-urban migration is the largest in the history of the world
-
More than 250 million Chinese people are estimated to migrate to the cities each year (that’s 2/3 of the population of the US)
-
The Chinese population remained primarily rural all the way up to 2012. During that year, China’s urban population officially grew larger than the rural population
Floating population – 240 million people as of 2020
-
Non-hukou migrant without local residency rights are also called the ‘floating population’
-
Often it is the parents moving to the cities, leaving their young children to be raised by grandparents
-
These children are the forgotten casualties of China’s economic boom
-
These migrants have no access to healthcare, workers’ rights etc. in urban areas
-
Reform
-
Whilst the Hukou System has been successful, it is widely disliked
-
The Communist Party created an organized caste system with Hukou where the people from rural areas were systematically discriminated against
-
In 2014, reform was finally addressed by the government with the removal the rural and urban system of Hukou
-
All Chinese people will now simply be called residents, but, all social benefits are still tied to a resident’s hometown
-
There is a process to transfer residency, but it is extremely limited in the major cities
-
However, it will be easier for people from rural areas to move to other rural towns and smaller cities
Impact
-
The socio-economic impacts of 50+ years of “rural” and “urban” classification are incalculable
-
Generations were conditioned to believe they were second-rate citizens and received second-rate treatment
-
Even with restrictions somewhat relaxed, it will take help and a number of years for the damage to be repaired
-
This is an acceptable condition for China, as they have successfully avoided squatter settlements and public protests around their major cities
-
Today, there are still over 250 million people in rural areas living on less than $2/day
Responses