How Output Gaps Relate to Unemployment & Inflation
-
Understanding the relationship between output gaps, unemployment, and inflation is crucial for policymakers
-
Reducing a negative output gap by stimulating demand may lead to lower unemployment but could also contribute to inflation
-
Conversely, efforts to cool down an overheating economy with a positive output gap might reduce inflation but could result in higher unemployment
-
Relationship Between Output gaps & Unemployment / Inflationary Pressures
|
Macroeconomic Goal |
Positive Output Gap |
Negative Output Gap |
|---|---|---|
|
Low unemployment |
|
|
|
Low and stable inflation |
|
|
The Short Run Phillips Curve
-
The Short-run Phillips Curve (SRPC) observes that there may be a trade-off between unemployment and inflation
-
Rising inflation is often accompanied by falling unemployment
-
Rising unemployment is often accompanied by falling inflation
-
This trade-off makes it difficult for the government to achieve both low unemployment and low inflation
-
Diagram: The Short-run Phillips Curve

Diagram analysis
-
The economy is initially in equilibrium at AP1YFE
-
At this point, unemployment is at 4% and inflation is at 3% and this is considered to be full employment (YFE)
-
There is always some unemployment due to the frictional and structural unemployment that exists
-
-
An increase in AD from AD1→AD2 causes a positive output gap (YFE – Y2)
-
With an increase in output the demand for labour rises and unemployment falls from 4% → 3%
-
The remaining labour in the market is scarcer and workers are able to negotiate higher wages
-
This causes wage inflation in the economy
-
-
Wage inflation leads to an increase in inflation from 3% → 4%
-
-
A decrease in AD from AD1 → AD3 causes a negative output gap (YFE – Y3)
-
With a decrease in output, the demand for labour falls and unemployment rises from 4% → 5%
-
Labour is more abundant, and to get hired workers have to accept lower wages
-
This causes wage deflation in the economy
-
-
Wage deflation leads to a decrease in inflation from 3% → 2%
-
The Long Run Phillips Curve
-
The long-run Phillips curve (LRPC) suggests there is no trade-off between inflation and unemployment in the long run
-
The curve is based on the idea of a natural rate of unemployment (NRU)
-
This is the unemployment rate that prevails when the economy is operating at its full potential
-
It represents the level of unemployment consistent with non-accelerating inflation, meaning that further reductions in the unemployment rate cannot be achieved without generating inflationary pressures
-
-
The LRPC is vertical at the natural rate of unemployment
-
In the long-run, the short-run Phillips curve moves around the vertical long run curve as the labour market self corrects in the long run
-
In the long-run wages and prices are flexible
-
Diagram: SRPC Self Correction to LRPC

Diagram analysis
-
The NRU of 4.5% represents the LRPC
-
in the short-run, AD has increased causing a leftward movement along the SRPC from point A → B (higher inflation and lower unemployment)
-
In the long-run, the economy will move from point B to C as following the increase in AD, workers see their real wages fall and so eventually demand higher wages
-
In response, firms reduce employment and raise prices, returning unemployment to its natural rate (NRU), now at a higher inflation rate
-
-
If there has been deflation in the economy, workers will accept lower wages in the long-run and employment and output will return to the full-employment level
The Implications of the Phillips Curve for Economic Policy
The implications for short-run policy decisions
-
Governments have to accept trade-offs in the macroeconomic objectives
-
Achieving one objective may come at the cost of worsening progress in another objective
-
Increasing economic growth causes the economy to move closer to full employment
-
However, prices for remaining resources are bid up leading to inflation which may outpace the target inflation rate of 2%
-
An Explanation of the Common Trade-offs that Exist Between the Macroeconomic Objectives
|
Trade-off |
Explanation |
|---|---|
|
High economic growth and inflation |
|
|
High economic growth and environmental sustainability |
|
|
Economic growth and inequality |
|
|
Low unemployment and low inflation |
|
The implications for long-run policy decisions
-
LRPC suggests that there is no permanent trade-off between inflation and unemployment over an extended period
-
In the long run, the economy tends to return to its natural or potential level of output
-
Policymakers should not use demand side policies (monetary/fiscal) to permanently reduce unemployment below its natural rate.
-
Attempts to do so may lead to higher inflation without sustaining lower unemployment
-
-
Instead, policymakers should consider supply-side policies, such as education and training programs, labour market reforms, and measures that enhance productivity and efficiency
-
Examiner Tips and Tricks
If you are asked to explain a particular trade off, make sure you explain all of the steps in the process E.g. if economic growth increases too quickly, there is likely to be demand-pull inflation, which raises the cost of living for the citizens, resulting in them feeling poorer, as the purchasing power of their wage has decreased
Responses